Reading Tip!
>To get to the fulltext easy, use the library proxy bookmarklet or activate our Pubmed url for the Get it! button!
Categories
- Acta Derm Venereol (8)
- Allergy (2)
- Am J Dermatopathol (1)
- Am J Kidney Dis (1)
- Anal Bioanal Chem (1)
- Anal Chem (1)
- Ann Med (1)
- Arch Dermatol (3)
- Arch Phys Med Rehabil (1)
- Arthritis Res Ther (1)
- Arthritis Rheum (1)
- Australas J Dermatol (1)
- BMC Proc (1)
- Br J Dermatol (50)
- Cell Tissue Res (1)
- Clin Exp Dermatol (2)
- Contact Dermatitis (51)
- Dermatol Clin (3)
- Dermatol Res Pract (1)
- Dermatol Surg (1)
- Disabil Rehabil (1)
- Discov Med (2)
- Drugs Aging (2)
- Eur J Dermatol (10)
- Eur J Immunol (1)
- Exp Dermatol (4)
- Front Immunol (1)
- Genes Immun (1)
- Genet Test Mol Biomarkers (1)
- Hum Mol Genet (1)
- Hum Mutat (1)
- Hum Pathol (1)
- Infect Immun (1)
- Inflamm Bowel Dis (1)
- Int J Dermatol (1)
- Int J Med Microbiol (1)
- Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (1)
- J Allergy Clin Immunol (3)
- J Am Acad Dermatol (10)
- J Clin Invest (1)
- J Clin Virol (1)
- J Cutan Pathol (3)
- J Dermatol Sci (2)
- J Dtsch Dermatol Ges (4)
- J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol (9)
- J Hand Ther (1)
- J Immunol (1)
- J Invest Dermatol (20)
- J Med Genet (1)
- J Strength Cond Res (2)
- JAMA Dermatol (4)
- JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc (1)
- Lab Chip (1)
- Methods Mol Biol (1)
- Mol Vis (1)
- N Engl J Med (1)
- Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd (13)
- Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd (1)
- Neth J Med (1)
- Occup Environ Med (1)
- Opt Lett (1)
- PLoS One (2)
- Qual Health Res (1)
- Regul Toxicol Pharmacol (2)
- Report (1)
- Sci Transl Med (1)
- Skin Res Technol (2)
- Trials (1)
Archives
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- July 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- August 2016
- July 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
Contributors
Meta
Monthly Archives: March 2014
The optimal patch test concentration for ascaridole as a sensitizing component of tea tree oil.
Related Articles |
The optimal patch test concentration for ascaridole as a sensitizing component of tea tree oil.
Contact Dermatitis. 2014 Mar 20;
Authors: Christoffers WA, Blömeke B, Coenraads PJ, Schuttelaar ML
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tea tree oil is used as a natural remedy, but is also a popular ingredient in household and cosmetic products. Oxidation of tea tree oil results in degradation products, such as ascaridole, which may cause allergic contact dermatitis.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the optimal patch test concentration for ascaridole, and to investigate the relationship between a positive reaction to ascaridole and a positive reaction to oxidized tea tree oil.
PATIENTS/MATERIALS/METHODS: Three hundred and nineteen patients with eczema were patch tested with ascaridole 1%, 2%, and 5%, and 250 patients were patch tested with oxidized tea tree oil 5%. Readings were performed on D3 and D7 according to a patch test calibration protocol.
RESULTS: With an increasing ascaridole test concentration, the frequency of positive reactions increased: ascaridole 1%, 1.4%; ascaridole 2%, 5.5%; and ascaridole 5%, 7.2%. However, the frequencies of irritant and doubtful reactions also increased, especially for ascaridole 5%. A positive reaction to ascaridole was related to a positive reaction to tea tree oil.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is in support of ascaridole being a sensitizer. We recommend patch testing with ascaridole at 2%. The finding that every positive reaction to oxidized tea tree oil is accompanied by a positive reaction to ascaridole suggests that ascaridole might be a contact allergen in oxidized tea tree oil.
PMID: 24645715 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]
Posted in Contact Dermatitis
Comments Off on The optimal patch test concentration for ascaridole as a sensitizing component of tea tree oil.
Two decades of occupational (meth)acrylate patch test results and focus on isobornyl acrylate.
Related Articles
Two decades of occupational (meth)acrylate patch test results and focus on isobornyl acrylate.
Contact Dermatitis. 2013 Aug;69(2):86-92
Authors: Christoffers WA, Coenraads PJ, Schuttelaar ML
Abstract
… Continue reading
Posted in Contact Dermatitis
Comments Off on Two decades of occupational (meth)acrylate patch test results and focus on isobornyl acrylate.
Plectin mutations underlie epidermolysis bullosa simplex in 8% of patients.
Related Articles
Plectin mutations underlie epidermolysis bullosa simplex in 8% of patients.
J Invest Dermatol. 2014 Jan;134(1):273-6
Authors: Bolling MC, Jongbloed JD, Boven LG, Diercks GF, Smith FJ, McLean WH, Jonkman MF
… Continue reading
Posted in J Invest Dermatol
Comments Off on Plectin mutations underlie epidermolysis bullosa simplex in 8% of patients.
Successful therapeutic transplantation of revertant skin in epidermolysis bullosa.
![]() |
Related Articles |
Successful therapeutic transplantation of revertant skin in epidermolysis bullosa.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Jan;70(1):98-101
Authors: Gostyński A, Pasmooij AM, Jonkman MF
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of genetic blistering diseases. Despite many efforts, treatment for EB remains symptomatic. Revertant mosaicism, coexistence of cells carrying disease-causing mutations with cells in which the inherited mutation is genetically corrected by a spontaneous genetic event (revertant cells) in 1 individual, can be found in EB. The naturally corrected revertant keratinocytes provide an opportunity for autologous cell therapy.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to locally treat EB by transplantation of revertant skin.
METHODS: Persistent ulcers in a patient with non-Herlitz junctional EB caused by mutations in the LAMB3 gene were treated by transplantation of split-thickness biopsy specimens from one of his revertant patches.
RESULTS: All transplanted biopsy specimens were accepted and complete re-epithelialization occurred within 14 days. During 18 months of follow-up, the patient never experienced blisters or wounds in the grafted area, nor in the healed donor site. Immunofluorescence and DNA sequencing showed that acceptor sites healed with transplanted revertant keratinocytes.
LIMITATIONS: Punch grafting allows only limited expansion of revertant skin.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that phenotypical and genotypical correction of skin in patients with revertant mosaicism by expansion of revertant skin might be a promising therapeutic option for cutaneous manifestations of EB.
PMID: 24176523 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]
Posted in J Am Acad Dermatol
Comments Off on Successful therapeutic transplantation of revertant skin in epidermolysis bullosa.