Reading Tip!
>To get to the fulltext easy, use the library proxy bookmarklet or activate our Pubmed url for the Get it! button!
Categories
- Acta Derm Venereol (8)
- Allergy (2)
- Am J Dermatopathol (1)
- Am J Kidney Dis (1)
- Anal Bioanal Chem (1)
- Anal Chem (1)
- Ann Med (1)
- Arch Dermatol (3)
- Arch Phys Med Rehabil (1)
- Arthritis Res Ther (1)
- Arthritis Rheum (1)
- Australas J Dermatol (1)
- BMC Proc (1)
- Br J Dermatol (50)
- Cell Tissue Res (1)
- Clin Exp Dermatol (2)
- Contact Dermatitis (51)
- Dermatol Clin (3)
- Dermatol Res Pract (1)
- Dermatol Surg (1)
- Disabil Rehabil (1)
- Discov Med (2)
- Drugs Aging (2)
- Eur J Dermatol (10)
- Eur J Immunol (1)
- Exp Dermatol (4)
- Front Immunol (1)
- Genes Immun (1)
- Genet Test Mol Biomarkers (1)
- Hum Mol Genet (1)
- Hum Mutat (1)
- Hum Pathol (1)
- Infect Immun (1)
- Inflamm Bowel Dis (1)
- Int J Dermatol (1)
- Int J Med Microbiol (1)
- Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (1)
- J Allergy Clin Immunol (3)
- J Am Acad Dermatol (10)
- J Clin Invest (1)
- J Clin Virol (1)
- J Cutan Pathol (3)
- J Dermatol Sci (2)
- J Dtsch Dermatol Ges (4)
- J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol (9)
- J Hand Ther (1)
- J Immunol (1)
- J Invest Dermatol (20)
- J Med Genet (1)
- J Strength Cond Res (2)
- JAMA Dermatol (4)
- JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc (1)
- Lab Chip (1)
- Methods Mol Biol (1)
- Mol Vis (1)
- N Engl J Med (1)
- Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd (13)
- Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd (1)
- Neth J Med (1)
- Occup Environ Med (1)
- Opt Lett (1)
- PLoS One (2)
- Qual Health Res (1)
- Regul Toxicol Pharmacol (2)
- Report (1)
- Sci Transl Med (1)
- Skin Res Technol (2)
- Trials (1)
Archives
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- July 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- August 2016
- July 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
Contributors
Meta
Monthly Archives: November 2018
Immediate hypersensitivity to p-phenylenediamine.
Related Articles
Immediate hypersensitivity to p-phenylenediamine.
Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Nov 13;:
Authors: Wilkinson M, Solman L, Coenraads PJ, Goebel C
PMID: 30426523 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]
Posted in Contact Dermatitis
Comments Off on Immediate hypersensitivity to p-phenylenediamine.
Contact sensitization to hydroperoxides of limonene and linalool: Results of consecutive patch testing and clinical relevance.
![]() |
Related Articles |
Contact sensitization to hydroperoxides of limonene and linalool: Results of consecutive patch testing and clinical relevance.
Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Oct 31;:
Authors: Dittmar D, Schuttelaar MLA
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hydroperoxides of limonene and linalool are potent sensitizers.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of contact allergy to both hydroperoxides of limonene and hydroperoxides of linalool, to report clinical relevance, and to investigate patient demographics.
METHODS: A total of 821 patients (35.6% male, mean age 42.4 years ± 17.8 years) were consecutively patch tested with our departmental baseline series and our fragrance series, including hydroperoxides of limonene 0.3% pet. and hydroperoxides of linalool 1.0% pet. The clinical relevance was assessed for all positive reactions.
RESULTS: Positive patch test reactions to hydroperoxides of limonene and to hydroperoxides of linalool were observed in 77 patients (9.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.4%-11.4%) and in 96 patients (11.7%, 95%CI: 9.5%-13.9%), respectively; 38 of these patients (4.6%, 95%CI: 3.2%-6.0%) reacted to both. Most reactions were considered to be possibly or probably clinically relevant (66.3% and 68.8%, respectively), and a small proportion were deemed to be of certain clinical relevance (18.2% and 19.8%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: As compared with previous studies, high numbers of positive reactions to both hydroperoxides of limonene and hydroperoxides of linalool were observed, the majority of which were clinically relevant, supporting their inclusion in the European baseline series.
PMID: 30378131 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]
Posted in Contact Dermatitis
Comments Off on Contact sensitization to hydroperoxides of limonene and linalool: Results of consecutive patch testing and clinical relevance.